Understand that a public company is driven by its stockholders and governed by its board. Boards are supposed to represent the stockholders. Boards are also the collective conscience of the organization, they can tap the brakes when needed. However, the board cannot really execute anything or operate the machine on a daily basis. The CEO is supposed to deliver a plan to the board for achieving whatever goal they set in place and execute that plan. Plan fails --> CEO gets fired. Plan works --> CEO gets rewards.
Getting a long-term CEO is nice, but short-term CEOs are often necessary. They make the cuts, make hard decisions, and move on or get moved along. Once the company is achieving what the board wants, they usually quietly shift to a long-term CEO with a steady hand.
It is the CEO that decides where the markets are and how to convince people to give up their money.
The Harley brand is part of the issue. It is very polarizing. You have the die-hard Harley Loyalist and the people who hate them. It's a huge issue for them.
Harley built up for years of the outlaw biker image, it was ingrained in the collective consciousness through movies and television. It worked for them for a while especially for the traditionalist and Baby boomer generations. So much the Harley was paralyzed to move forward in design and offerings because of their core customer base rejecting anything but the old inferior design and culture.
This put Harley behind the 8-ball and they are paying for it. Harley tried to appeal to the younger generation with electric and woke policies. But the younger generations view of the Harley brand is tainted as an old man knuckle dragging biker gang riding inferior bikes.
Indian being fairly new and gone for such a long time, doesn't have the baggage and negative polarizing brand recognition that Harley does.
The only way Harley will regain success is a much smaller company.
Indian is a very small and tiny company (Polaris division) thus the small dealership footprint. Most people think Indian is a big company like Harley, Polaris is and is bigger. But Indian Motorcycle is a tiny company, and they are successful because they don't overexpose themselves.
These are correct statements.
Harley worked in the shadows of Indian for many of their early years (including losing lawsuits / money to Indian for patent violations). Where HD stood apart was in creating and selling a lifestyle / image that went hand in hand with their bikes. Their branded merchandise supported what expenses the motorcycles sales couldn't cover. Then they benefitted from Hendee and Hedstrom leaving Indian and the sale of the company to DuPont Motors, who stabilized the finances. Despite Indian introducing the Chief in 1940, Harley had a HUGE upswing in sales to the government during WWII, where Indian wasn't nearly aggressive enough to match HD. All of this lead to the sale and eventual financial downfall of Indian. As stated above, Polaris raised Indian from the ashes in 2011. The history of both companies spans many wars, economic depression / recessions, changes in ownership, and shifting demographics.
We're just now recovering form a global pandemic (you can debate the origins and effects of that for yourselves) and are seeing all-time lows in the birthrate in developed Countries (that in and of itself limits the number of potential / future riders that ANY company can bet their future on).
As stated above, the same "loyalists" who've committed to / identified with the HD lifestyle are creating a rift in the customer base that HD seems unable to adjust to. Add that to a smaller pool of potential customers and HD has to change their product line (and pricing) as well as ridding themselves of unprofitable practices and products. The very strength of HD (their enormous dealership network) is at risk, as we've already seen.
I personally believe BOTH companies missed a huge opportunity to grow through the pandemic - it was the PERFECT time to market riding to a society encouraged to isolate and maintain distance between people, but that's no longer here nor there.
HD needs to shut down or sell off the LiveWire Division, develop
an affordable entry level series for young riders that the Nightster has failed to attract, and offer at least a few liquid-cooled models (as Indian has done) to keep loyalists looking for something better / less antiquated and limited, or risk losing everything to their competitors who are in a better place.
Maybe the new CEO will be just what the company needs. IF he can bring some financial stability to the company / stop the bleeding (of cash), that would open up more opportunities for HD long term - whether it be under current ownership or not. There are a LOT of employees (direct, and in the dealership chain) that have a LOT at risk.
Desperate times require desperate measures. Sometimes a radical change is needed.
If you're having trouble seeing the future, you just might need new glasses.