I didn't like that call either. But it is what it is. But one question I have is would you rather win on a technicality or win because you were the first one to cross the finish line? I don't imagine winning on a technicality would be as sweet for me.
I don’t understand how there’s even a controversy with the Kentucky Derby. Watch a replay closely and you will see Maximum Security’s back legs come within an inch of interlocking with the front legs of War of Will - forcing War of Will left, and he then bumped into Long Range Toddy who bumps Country House. Clearly a foul that clearly slows down those three horses.
Even the jockey, Luis Saez, at first admitted the interference. He blamed it on the horses youth and inexperience combined with the extraordinary loud crowd noise. He said that caused Maximum Security to veer away from the rail, causing the interference.
By the rules Maximum Security is then placed behind the lowest finishing of those three.
No doubt Maximum Security would have won the race without that interference (accidental as it was). But it was a good call to move Maximum Security back. Like most rules, these exist for a reason.
So, since we are in the information age, one of the trends going on is Memes and demotivationals.. they're traded in emails social media, and MMS messages daily and can be good for turn'n frowns, upside down! I thought it would be fun to bring them here for us to chuckle like the chuckling...
The report goes on to say that “the impact caused catastrophic air loss to the left front tire of the truck, which left a tire mark on the center line of the road,” Duguay says in his motion...
I looked but didn't find a post on what riders use to conceal carry when you ride. Seems more and more you hear of someone killing innocent people. I'm getting my conceal carry class next week and looking real hard at the Taurus t111 Gen2 40mm. I have carried a 22mag in saddle bag but wasn't legal.
Preferably motorcycle-related — but if not, .... keep em clean and apolitical.
-UPDATE : no graphically disturbing images !! (You wouldn’t think I’d have to articulate that, eh — but I do...)
(see post #8184)